
Core i7-1355U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1355U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,116 vs 14,173).
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1355U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i7-1355U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core i7-1355U
2023Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,116 vs 14,173).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-1355U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i7-1355U moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1355U better than Ryzen 5 4600H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 280 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 347 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 353 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 353 FPS | 287 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1355U and Ryzen 5 4600H

Core i7-1355U
Core i7-1355U
The Core i7-1355U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 14,116 points. Launch price was $469.


Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-1355U packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600H offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-1355U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-1355U versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-1355U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-1355U uses the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1355U scores 14,116 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1355U vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3 GHz+76% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-U (2023) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 14,116 | 14,173 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1355U uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-1355U | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











