Core i5-10600KF vs Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel

Core i5-10600KF

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 4600H

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-10600KF

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,140 vs 14,173).
  • Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 4600H

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 4600H better than Core i5-10600KF?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-10600KF is ahead with a 25.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600H pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i5-10600KF also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 4600H is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 4600H is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-10600KF makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 5 4600H is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i5-10600KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 25.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-10600KF is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (56.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 4600H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
1080p
low301 FPS173 FPS
medium263 FPS141 FPS
high221 FPS112 FPS
ultra189 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low247 FPS148 FPS
medium195 FPS119 FPS
high160 FPS93 FPS
ultra140 FPS73 FPS
4K
low170 FPS69 FPS
medium136 FPS60 FPS
high105 FPS47 FPS
ultra92 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
1080p
low354 FPS267 FPS
medium354 FPS224 FPS
high338 FPS196 FPS
ultra295 FPS153 FPS
1440p
low354 FPS225 FPS
medium332 FPS193 FPS
high301 FPS173 FPS
ultra262 FPS139 FPS
4K
low339 FPS192 FPS
medium279 FPS171 FPS
high254 FPS149 FPS
ultra214 FPS114 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
1080p
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS354 FPS
high354 FPS354 FPS
ultra354 FPS354 FPS
1440p
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS354 FPS
high354 FPS354 FPS
ultra354 FPS354 FPS
4K
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS353 FPS
high354 FPS301 FPS
ultra318 FPS242 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
1080p
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS354 FPS
high354 FPS354 FPS
ultra354 FPS354 FPS
1440p
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS354 FPS
high354 FPS354 FPS
ultra354 FPS354 FPS
4K
low354 FPS354 FPS
medium354 FPS354 FPS
high354 FPS342 FPS
ultra354 FPS287 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600KF and Ryzen 5 4600H

Intel

Core i5-10600KF

The Core i5-10600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,140 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 5 4600H

The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-10600KF and Ryzen 5 4600H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600KF versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600KF (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10600KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600KF scores 14,140 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600KF vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.

FeatureCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+20%
4 GHz
Base Clock
4.1 GHz+37%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
PassMark
14,140
14,173
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-10600KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
Socket
LGA1200
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10600KF) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4600H). Primary use case: Core i5-10600KF targets Gaming.

FeatureCore i5-10600KFRyzen 5 4600H
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming