
Core i5-10600KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10600KF
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,140 vs 14,173).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i5-10600KF
2020Ryzen 5 4600H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,140 vs 14,173).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $250 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 4600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600KF across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 4600H better than Core i5-10600KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 114 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 242 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 287 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600KF and Ryzen 5 4600H

Core i5-10600KF
Core i5-10600KF
The Core i5-10600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,140 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 4600H
Ryzen 5 4600H
The Ryzen 5 4600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,173 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-10600KF and Ryzen 5 4600H share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600KF versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600H — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10600KF (base: 4.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-10600KF uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600KF scores 14,140 against the Ryzen 5 4600H's 14,173 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 4600H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600KF vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+20% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+37% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 14,140 | 14,173 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600KF uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10600KF) / not specified (Ryzen 5 4600H). Primary use case: Core i5-10600KF targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i5-10600KF | Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











