
Core i9-9900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.2 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($423 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $268 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 172.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 31.2 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,208).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Core i9-9900T
2019Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $268 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 172.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 31.2 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.2 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($423 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,208).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900T better than Ryzen 5 3500X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 160 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 5 3500X

Core i9-9900T
Core i9-9900T
The Core i9-9900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,208 points. Launch price was $439.


Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3500X offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i9-9900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-9900T versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9900T uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900T scores 13,208 against the Ryzen 5 3500X's 13,165 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-9900T. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 6 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,208 | 13,165 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-9900T launched at $423 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3500X debuted at $155. On MSRP ($423 vs $155), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900T delivers 31.2 pts/$ vs 84.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3500X — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 92.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $423 | $155-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.2 | 84.9+172% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












