Core i9-9900T vs Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel

Core i9-9900T

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3500X

6 Cores6 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-9900T

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.2 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($423 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).

Ryzen 5 3500X

2019

Why buy it

  • +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Costs $268 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
  • Delivers 172.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 31.2 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,165 vs 13,208).
  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9900T better than Ryzen 5 3500X?
Yes. Core i9-9900T is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9900T is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9900T is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-9900T is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 3500X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i9-9900T is 172.9% more expensive on MSRP at $423 MSRP versus $155 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 3500X is also 172.0% better value on MSRP (84.9 vs 31.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3500X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3500X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
1080p
low173 FPS197 FPS
medium150 FPS159 FPS
high121 FPS133 FPS
ultra102 FPS103 FPS
1440p
low147 FPS154 FPS
medium125 FPS119 FPS
high100 FPS96 FPS
ultra85 FPS74 FPS
4K
low83 FPS70 FPS
medium76 FPS58 FPS
high60 FPS46 FPS
ultra47 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
1080p
low207 FPS329 FPS
medium176 FPS329 FPS
high161 FPS327 FPS
ultra144 FPS294 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS329 FPS
medium163 FPS329 FPS
high148 FPS298 FPS
ultra128 FPS263 FPS
4K
low134 FPS286 FPS
medium120 FPS249 FPS
high115 FPS221 FPS
ultra99 FPS198 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
1080p
low330 FPS329 FPS
medium330 FPS329 FPS
high330 FPS329 FPS
ultra330 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low330 FPS329 FPS
medium330 FPS329 FPS
high330 FPS329 FPS
ultra330 FPS301 FPS
4K
low330 FPS309 FPS
medium327 FPS243 FPS
high286 FPS204 FPS
ultra226 FPS160 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
1080p
low330 FPS329 FPS
medium330 FPS329 FPS
high330 FPS329 FPS
ultra330 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low330 FPS329 FPS
medium330 FPS329 FPS
high330 FPS329 FPS
ultra330 FPS329 FPS
4K
low330 FPS329 FPS
medium330 FPS329 FPS
high330 FPS329 FPS
ultra318 FPS329 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 5 3500X

Intel

Core i9-9900T

The Core i9-9900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,208 points. Launch price was $439.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3500X

The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i9-9900T packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3500X offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Core i9-9900T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-9900T versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9900T uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900T scores 13,208 against the Ryzen 5 3500X's 13,165 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-9900T. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X.

FeatureCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 6
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+7%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
13,208
13,165
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9900T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-9900T launched at $423 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3500X debuted at $155. On MSRP ($423 vs $155), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $268 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900T delivers 31.2 pts/$ vs 84.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3500X — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 92.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-9900TRyzen 5 3500X
MSRP
$423
$155-63%
Performance per Dollar
31.2
84.9+172%
Release Date
2019
2019