
Core i3-12300T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-12300T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,162 vs 13,165).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.0 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 63.0 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-12300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i3-12300T
2022Ryzen 5 3500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($155 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.9 vs 63.0 PassMark/$ ($155 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,162 vs 13,165).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 63.0 vs 84.9 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $155 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i3-12300T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-12300T better than Ryzen 5 3500X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 160 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 298 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-12300T and Ryzen 5 3500X

Core i3-12300T
Core i3-12300T
The Core i3-12300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,162 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3500X
Ryzen 5 3500X
The Ryzen 5 3500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,165 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-12300T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3500X offers 6 cores / 6 threads — the Ryzen 5 3500X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-12300T versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500X — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i3-12300T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i3-12300T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-12300T scores 13,162 against the Ryzen 5 3500X's 13,165 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-12300T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500X.
| Feature | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 6+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+2% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 13,162 | 13,165 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-12300T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-12300T launched at $209 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3500X debuted at $155. On MSRP ($209 vs $155), the Ryzen 5 3500X is $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-12300T delivers 63.0 pts/$ vs 84.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3500X — making the Ryzen 5 3500X the 29.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-12300T | Ryzen 5 3500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $209 | $155-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.0 | 84.9+35% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












