
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
2019Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Ryzen 5 3500U


Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,813 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Ryzen 5 3500U's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE scores 6,813 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+57% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,813 | 6,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 876 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












