
Core i7-980
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-980
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-980 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-980 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,890).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-980
2011Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 130W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-980 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-980 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,890).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-980 better than Ryzen 5 3500U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-980 and Ryzen 5 3500U

Core i7-980
Core i7-980
The Core i7-980 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,890 points. Launch price was $1,109.


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-980 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3500U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-980 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-980 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 3.33 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-980 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-980 scores 6,890 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-980. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-980 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.33 GHz+59% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,890 | 6,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 876 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-980 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-980) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-980 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













