
Core i7-7700HQ
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700HQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,880).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i7-7700HQ
2017Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700HQ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,836 vs 6,880).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-7700HQ better than Ryzen 5 3500U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7700HQ and Ryzen 5 3500U

Core i7-7700HQ
Core i7-7700HQ
The Core i7-7700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,880 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-7700HQ and Ryzen 5 3500U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-7700HQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700HQ (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-7700HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700HQ scores 6,880 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-7700HQ. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+33% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake-H (2017) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,880 | 6,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 876 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-7700HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700HQ) vs 12 (Ryzen 5 3500U) — the Core i7-7700HQ offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: BGA1440 (Core i7-7700HQ) and Mobile (Ryzen 5 3500U).
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7700HQ) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700HQ) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 5 3500U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Core i7-7700HQ | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













