
Core i5-8305G
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-8305G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,801 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-8305G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8305G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i5-8305G
2018Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-8305G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,801 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8305G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Core i5-8305G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8305G and Ryzen 5 3500U

Core i5-8305G
Core i5-8305G
The Core i5-8305G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,801 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-8305G and Ryzen 5 3500U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-8305G versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8305G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-8305G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8305G scores 6,801 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8305G vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+33% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake G (2018) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,801 | 6,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 876 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-8305G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2270 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-8305G) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-8305G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Core i5-8305G | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












