Core i5-8305G vs Ryzen 5 3500U

Intel

Core i5-8305G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3500U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-8305G

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +35.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,801 vs 6,836).
  • Launch MSRP is still $350 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 3500U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 5 3500U

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i5-8305G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-8305G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Core i5-8305G?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i5-8305G is ahead with a 35.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3500U pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-8305G also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3500U is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3500U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Ryzen 5 3500U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $350 MSRP, and it gives you 0.5% better PassMark. Core i5-8305G only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 3500U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
1080p
low170 FPS169 FPS
medium146 FPS149 FPS
high117 FPS120 FPS
ultra92 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low150 FPS142 FPS
medium117 FPS121 FPS
high93 FPS95 FPS
ultra73 FPS76 FPS
4K
low70 FPS67 FPS
medium59 FPS61 FPS
high47 FPS48 FPS
ultra37 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
1080p
low170 FPS120 FPS
medium170 FPS105 FPS
high170 FPS97 FPS
ultra146 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low170 FPS103 FPS
medium170 FPS90 FPS
high161 FPS83 FPS
ultra131 FPS70 FPS
4K
low169 FPS77 FPS
medium146 FPS69 FPS
high118 FPS56 FPS
ultra89 FPS42 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
1080p
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS
4K
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
1080p
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS
1440p
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS
4K
low170 FPS171 FPS
medium170 FPS171 FPS
high170 FPS171 FPS
ultra170 FPS171 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-8305G and Ryzen 5 3500U

Intel

Core i5-8305G

The Core i5-8305G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2270. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,801 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3500U

The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-8305G and Ryzen 5 3500U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-8305G versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8305G (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-8305G uses the Kaby Lake G (2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-8305G scores 6,801 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-8305G vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+3%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+33%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Kaby Lake G (2018)
Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
PassMark
6,801
6,836
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,545
Geekbench 6 Single
876
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-8305G uses the FCBGA2270 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
Socket
FCBGA2270
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-8305G) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). The Ryzen 5 3500U includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i5-8305G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.

FeatureCore i5-8305GRyzen 5 3500U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget