
Atom x7835RE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Atom x7835RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 15W, a 3W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 15W vs 12W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Atom x7835RE
2024Ryzen 5 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 12W instead of 15W, a 3W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP5 and DDR4.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 6,836).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $127 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 15W vs 12W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP5 with DDR4, while Atom x7835RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3500U better than Atom x7835RE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 171 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom x7835RE and Ryzen 5 3500U

Atom x7835RE
Atom x7835RE
The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.


Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U
The Ryzen 5 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,836 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3500U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom x7835RE has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3500U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3500U (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Ryzen 5 3500U's 6,836 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3500U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,795 | 6,836 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,545 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 876 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7835RE versus DDR4-2400 on the Ryzen 5 3500U — the Atom x7835RE supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3500U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7835RE) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3500U). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7835RE) vs 12 (Ryzen 5 3500U) — the Ryzen 5 3500U offers 3 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7835RE) and Mobile (Ryzen 5 3500U).
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 12+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7835RE) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 3500U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) (Atom x7835RE) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 5 3500U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3500U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3500U rivals Core i5-10210U.
| Feature | Atom x7835RE | Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












