
FX-8120
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3450U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
FX-8120
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $205 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Ryzen 5 3450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8120 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,550 vs 6,594).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-8120
2011Ryzen 5 3450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $205 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 3450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8120 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,550 vs 6,594).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is FX-8120 better than Ryzen 5 3450U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 164 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8120 and Ryzen 5 3450U

FX-8120
FX-8120
The FX-8120 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,594 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 3450U
Ryzen 5 3450U
The Ryzen 5 3450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,550 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The FX-8120 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3450U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8120 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the FX-8120 versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3450U — a 13.3% clock advantage for the FX-8120 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The FX-8120 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3450U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8120 scores 6,594 against the Ryzen 5 3450U's 6,550 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-8120. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-8120 vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 5 3450U.
| Feature | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+14% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+48% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB+100% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+300% | 2 MB |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,594 | 6,550 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8120 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3450U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-8120 | Ryzen 5 3450U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












