
Core i7-6700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6700K
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen 5 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 91W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.2 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 91W, a 56W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,933).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-6700K
2015Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Ryzen 5 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 132.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.2 vs 25.5 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 91W, a 56W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.5 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($350 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 91W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-6700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,825 vs 8,933).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6700K better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 221 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6700K and Ryzen 5 3400GE

Core i7-6700K
Core i7-6700K
The Core i7-6700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 August 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,933 points. Launch price was $339.


Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6700K and Ryzen 5 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-6700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-6700K uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700K scores 8,933 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-6700K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+5% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,933+1% | 8,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-6700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 3400GE). The Core i7-6700K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 530 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-6700K launched at $350 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($350 vs $149), the Ryzen 5 3400GE is $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700K delivers 25.5 pts/$ vs 59.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400GE — making the Ryzen 5 3400GE the 79.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-6700K | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $149-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.5 | 59.2+132% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












