
Core i5-1038NG7
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1038NG7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Ryzen 5 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,823 vs 8,825).
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Core i5-1038NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1038NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1038NG7
2020Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus Graphics G7, while Ryzen 5 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3400GE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,823 vs 8,825).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $149 MSRP, while Core i5-1038NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1038NG7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3400GE better than Core i5-1038NG7?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 221 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1038NG7 and Ryzen 5 3400GE

Core i5-1038NG7
Core i5-1038NG7
The Core i5-1038NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 8,823 points. Launch price was $320.


Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-1038NG7 and Ryzen 5 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-1038NG7 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3400GE (base: 2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1038NG7 scores 8,823 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400GE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-1038NG7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+65% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm-17% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,823 | 8,825 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-1038NG7 uses the FCBGA1344 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1344 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-3733 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1038NG7) / not specified (Ryzen 5 3400GE). The Core i5-1038NG7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus Graphics G7), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1038NG7 targets Premium Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1038NG7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U.
| Feature | Core i5-1038NG7 | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Plus Graphics G7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Premium Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












