
Core i3-10100F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 3400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10100F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 8,825).
Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 59.2 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Core i3-10100F
2020Ryzen 5 3400GE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 8,825).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 59.2 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10100F better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 221 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 5 3400GE

Core i3-10100F
Core i3-10100F
The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.


Ryzen 5 3400GE
Ryzen 5 3400GE
The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 5 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400GE. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 8,714 | 8,825+1% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-10100F launched at $88 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($88 vs $149), the Core i3-10100F is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100F delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 59.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400GE — making the Core i3-10100F the 50.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-10100F | Ryzen 5 3400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $88-41% | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 99.0+67% | 59.2 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












