Core i3-10100F vs Ryzen 5 3400GE

Intel

Core i3-10100F

4 Cores8 Thrd1 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3400GE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-10100F

2020

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Costs $61 less on MSRP ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Delivers 67.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$ ($88 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,714 vs 8,825).

Ryzen 5 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

  • +1.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-10100F across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 59.2 vs 99.0 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $88 MSRP).
  • 3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-10100F better than Ryzen 5 3400GE?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i3-10100F is ahead with a 8.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3400GE pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark. Core i3-10100F also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3400GE is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-10100F is the smarter buy today. Core i3-10100F is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $88 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 3400GE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.3% better PassMark. It is also 67.2% better value on MSRP (99.0 vs 59.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 5 3400GE can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-10100F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
1080p
low175 FPS172 FPS
medium138 FPS151 FPS
high108 FPS124 FPS
ultra87 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low152 FPS143 FPS
medium119 FPS121 FPS
high94 FPS96 FPS
ultra76 FPS76 FPS
4K
low83 FPS65 FPS
medium71 FPS58 FPS
high55 FPS46 FPS
ultra43 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
1080p
low218 FPS218 FPS
medium218 FPS189 FPS
high202 FPS173 FPS
ultra169 FPS136 FPS
1440p
low218 FPS187 FPS
medium200 FPS161 FPS
high178 FPS147 FPS
ultra149 FPS120 FPS
4K
low193 FPS138 FPS
medium163 FPS123 FPS
high136 FPS97 FPS
ultra109 FPS70 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
1080p
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS
1440p
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS
4K
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
1080p
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS
1440p
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS
4K
low218 FPS221 FPS
medium218 FPS221 FPS
high218 FPS221 FPS
ultra218 FPS221 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 5 3400GE

Intel

Core i3-10100F

The Core i3-10100F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,714 points. Launch price was $122.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 8,825 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-10100F and Ryzen 5 3400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100F versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3400GE — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100F (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-10100F uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100F scores 8,714 against the Ryzen 5 3400GE's 8,825 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3400GE. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i3-10100F vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3400GE.

FeatureCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+7%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+9%
3.3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark
8,714
8,825+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-10100F uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
Socket
LGA1200
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-10100F launched at $88 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($88 vs $149), the Core i3-10100F is $61 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-10100F delivers 99.0 pts/$ vs 59.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3400GE — making the Core i3-10100F the 50.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-10100FRyzen 5 3400GE
MSRP
$88-41%
$149
Performance per Dollar
99.0+67%
59.2
Release Date
2020
2019