
Ryzen 3 7440U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 7440U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,100 vs 13,145).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7440U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7440U across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7440U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7440U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 7440U
2023Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7440U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,100 vs 13,145).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7440U across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7440U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7440U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7440U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 167 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7440U and Ryzen 5 2600


Ryzen 3 7440U
Ryzen 3 7440U
The Ryzen 3 7440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,100 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 3 7440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7440U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7440U scores 13,100 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7440U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 6 / 12+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+21% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 4 nm-67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| PassMark | 13,100 | 13,145 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,163 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,893 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 7440U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7440U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | General Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












