Ryzen 3 7440U vs Ryzen 5 2600

AMD

Ryzen 3 7440U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2023

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 2600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 7440U

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (13,100 vs 13,145).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.

Ryzen 5 2600

2018

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 7440U.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7440U across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7440U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7440U moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7440U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 3 7440U is ahead with a 3.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 2600 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600 is the better fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 7440U is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 2600 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 3 7440U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 5 2600 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 2600 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7440U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018) and a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
1080p
low172 FPS183 FPS
medium141 FPS157 FPS
high112 FPS127 FPS
ultra90 FPS102 FPS
1440p
low149 FPS152 FPS
medium119 FPS125 FPS
high94 FPS98 FPS
ultra77 FPS77 FPS
4K
low84 FPS68 FPS
medium73 FPS60 FPS
high57 FPS47 FPS
ultra45 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
1080p
low328 FPS263 FPS
medium273 FPS227 FPS
high238 FPS202 FPS
ultra199 FPS162 FPS
1440p
low289 FPS236 FPS
medium235 FPS206 FPS
high210 FPS183 FPS
ultra172 FPS151 FPS
4K
low214 FPS186 FPS
medium180 FPS165 FPS
high149 FPS146 FPS
ultra121 FPS111 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
1080p
low328 FPS329 FPS
medium328 FPS329 FPS
high328 FPS329 FPS
ultra328 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low328 FPS329 FPS
medium328 FPS329 FPS
high328 FPS322 FPS
ultra328 FPS268 FPS
4K
low328 FPS304 FPS
medium328 FPS248 FPS
high328 FPS215 FPS
ultra308 FPS167 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
1080p
low328 FPS329 FPS
medium328 FPS329 FPS
high328 FPS329 FPS
ultra328 FPS329 FPS
1440p
low328 FPS329 FPS
medium328 FPS329 FPS
high328 FPS329 FPS
ultra328 FPS329 FPS
4K
low328 FPS329 FPS
medium328 FPS329 FPS
high328 FPS329 FPS
ultra328 FPS310 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7440U and Ryzen 5 2600

AMD

Ryzen 3 7440U

The Ryzen 3 7440U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,100 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 5 2600

The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 3 7440U packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 2600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7440U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7440U (base: 3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7440U scores 13,100 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7440U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.

FeatureRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz+21%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.4 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB+200%
Process
4 nm-67%
12 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023)
Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
PassMark
13,100
13,145
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,344
Geekbench 6 Single
1,163
Geekbench 6 Multi
4,893
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 7440U uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
Socket
FP7
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 3 7440U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.

FeatureRyzen 3 7440URyzen 5 2600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
General Productivity