
Core i5-11400T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-11400T
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.6 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Ryzen 5 2600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,891 vs 6,344).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 71.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-11400T
2021Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $17 less on MSRP ($182 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.6 vs 66.1 PassMark/$ ($182 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 730, while Ryzen 5 2600 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (3,891 vs 6,344).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.1 vs 71.6 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $182 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-11400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2600 better than Core i5-11400T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 167 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-11400T and Ryzen 5 2600

Core i5-11400T
Core i5-11400T
The Core i5-11400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,034 points. Launch price was $182.


Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-11400T and Ryzen 5 2600 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-11400T versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-11400T uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-11400T scores 13,034 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 3,891 vs 6,344 (47.9% advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,767 vs 1,163, a 41.2% lead for the Core i5-11400T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,179 vs 4,893 (23.2% advantage for the Core i5-11400T). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-11400T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+162% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 3 MB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| PassMark | 13,034 | 13,145 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,891 | 6,344+63% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,767+52% | 1,163 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,179+26% | 4,893 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-11400T uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-11400T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H510,B560,Z590,H470,Z490 (Core i5-11400T) and AMD B450,AMD X470,AMD B350,AMD X370 (Ryzen 5 2600).
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 2600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i5-11400T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-11400T) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). The Core i5-11400T includes integrated graphics (UHD 730), while the Ryzen 5 2600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-11400T targets Productivity, Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-11400T rivals Core i5-11400; Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Productivity | General Productivity |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-11400T launched at $182 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 2600 debuted at $199. On MSRP ($182 vs $199), the Core i5-11400T is $17 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-11400T delivers 71.6 pts/$ vs 66.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2600 — making the Core i5-11400T the 8.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-11400T | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $182-9% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.6+8% | 66.1 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












