Core i7-4930K vs Ryzen 5 2500X

Intel

Core i7-4930K

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 2500X

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-4930K

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,388).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
    • 100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.

    Ryzen 5 2500X

    2018

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
    • Costs $511 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
    • Delivers 321.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
    • Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Ryzen 5 2500X better than Core i7-4930K?
    Yes. Ryzen 5 2500X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 3.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 2500X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2500X is the better fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Ryzen 5 2500X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 2500X is $511 cheaper on MSRP at $159 MSRP versus $670 MSRP, and it gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 321.8% better value on MSRP (59.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Ryzen 5 2500X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    1080p
    low168 FPS219 FPS
    medium144 FPS187 FPS
    high116 FPS151 FPS
    ultra95 FPS108 FPS
    1440p
    low141 FPS182 FPS
    medium118 FPS149 FPS
    high93 FPS117 FPS
    ultra76 FPS83 FPS
    4K
    low64 FPS71 FPS
    medium57 FPS62 FPS
    high45 FPS49 FPS
    ultra35 FPS38 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    1080p
    low212 FPS235 FPS
    medium186 FPS209 FPS
    high171 FPS187 FPS
    ultra139 FPS146 FPS
    1440p
    low189 FPS216 FPS
    medium164 FPS188 FPS
    high152 FPS166 FPS
    ultra128 FPS134 FPS
    4K
    low163 FPS156 FPS
    medium143 FPS138 FPS
    high128 FPS113 FPS
    ultra95 FPS84 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    1080p
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS235 FPS
    1440p
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS235 FPS
    4K
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS201 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    1080p
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS235 FPS
    1440p
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS235 FPS
    4K
    low234 FPS235 FPS
    medium234 FPS235 FPS
    high234 FPS235 FPS
    ultra234 FPS235 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4930K and Ryzen 5 2500X

    Intel

    Core i7-4930K

    The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.

    AMD

    Ryzen 5 2500X

    The Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,388 points. Launch price was $149.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-4930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2500X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-4930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500X — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2500X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4930K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930K scores 9,379 against the Ryzen 5 2500X's 9,388 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2500X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500X.

    FeatureCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    Cores / Threads
    6 / 12+50%
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    3.9 GHz
    4 GHz+3%
    Base Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.6 GHz+6%
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)
    16 MB (total)+33%
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    512K (per core)+100%
    Process
    22 nm
    12 nm-45%
    Architecture
    Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
    Zen+ (2018−2019)
    PassMark
    9,379
    9,388
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-4930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    Socket
    LGA2011
    AM4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Core i7-4930K launched at $670 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 2500X debuted at $159. On MSRP ($670 vs $159), the Ryzen 5 2500X is $511 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4930K delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 59.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2500X — making the Ryzen 5 2500X the 123.3% better value option.

    FeatureCore i7-4930KRyzen 5 2500X
    MSRP
    $670
    $159-76%
    Performance per Dollar
    14.0
    59.0+321%
    Release Date
    2013
    2018