
Core i7-4930K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4930K
2013Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,388).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 2500X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $511 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-4930K
2013Ryzen 5 2500X
2018Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $511 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($159 MSRP vs $670 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2500X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,379 vs 9,388).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 59.0 PassMark/$ ($670 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 2500X better than Core i7-4930K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 235 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4930K and Ryzen 5 2500X

Core i7-4930K
Core i7-4930K
The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.


Ryzen 5 2500X
Ryzen 5 2500X
The Ryzen 5 2500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 9,388 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2500X offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-4930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2500X — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2500X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-4930K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930K scores 9,379 against the Ryzen 5 2500X's 9,388 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 2500X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2500X.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 12 nm-45% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge-E (2013) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,379 | 9,388 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2500X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4930K launched at $670 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 2500X debuted at $159. On MSRP ($670 vs $159), the Ryzen 5 2500X is $511 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4930K delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 59.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2500X — making the Ryzen 5 2500X the 123.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4930K | Ryzen 5 2500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $670 | $159-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 59.0+321% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












