
Processor 300
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Processor 300
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.6 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2400GE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌31.4% higher power demand at 46W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 46W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Processor 300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor 300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,264).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.8 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Processor 300
2024Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.6 vs 42.8 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 46W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Processor 300 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor 300.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 2400GE across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌31.4% higher power demand at 46W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,264).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.8 vs 88.6 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor 300 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor 300 better than Ryzen 5 2400GE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Processor 300 and Ryzen 5 2400GE

Processor 300
Processor 300
The Processor 300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 7,264 points. Launch price was $82.


Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Processor 300 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2400GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 5 2400GE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Processor 300 versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Processor 300 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Processor 300 scores 7,264 against the Ryzen 5 2400GE's 7,237 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor 300. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor 300 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE.
| Feature | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+22% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,264 | 7,237 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 826 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,847 |
Memory & Platform
The Processor 300 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Processor 300) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Processor 300 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 11 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Processor 300 launched at $82 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 2400GE debuted at $169. On MSRP ($82 vs $169), the Processor 300 is $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Processor 300 delivers 88.6 pts/$ vs 42.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 2400GE — making the Processor 300 the 69.7% better value option.
| Feature | Processor 300 | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $82-51% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.6+107% | 42.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













