
Core i7-6920HQ
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 2400GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-6920HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Core i7-6920HQ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6920HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,269).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-6920HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Core i7-6920HQ
2015Ryzen 5 2400GE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 11, while Core i7-6920HQ needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-6920HQ.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 2400GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2400GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,237 vs 7,269).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-6920HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-6920HQ better than Ryzen 5 2400GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 181 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-6920HQ and Ryzen 5 2400GE

Core i7-6920HQ
Core i7-6920HQ
The Core i7-6920HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,269 points. Launch price was $568.


Ryzen 5 2400GE
Ryzen 5 2400GE
The Ryzen 5 2400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,237 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-6920HQ and Ryzen 5 2400GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-6920HQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2400GE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-6920HQ uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6920HQ scores 7,269 against the Ryzen 5 2400GE's 7,237 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-6920HQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-6920HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2400GE.
| Feature | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (2015−2016) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,269 | 7,237 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 826 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,847 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-6920HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-6920HQ) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2400GE). The Ryzen 5 2400GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 11), while the Core i7-6920HQ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-6920HQ | Ryzen 5 2400GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 11 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













