
Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 520 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 579 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 579 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 240 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 240 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 13.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 240 uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 240 scores 23,167 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 91.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 23,167 | 62,323+169% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 240 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 240) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 5 240 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($0 vs $699), the Ryzen 5 240 is $699 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 240 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












