
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 240

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 65.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+98% | 23,167 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 240 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($409 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 240 is $409 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












