Core i7-13700K vs Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i7-13700K

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

i7-13700K

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 240

2025

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 45,784).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 240?
Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 7.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 97.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 7.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 97.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 240 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
1080p
low284 FPS265 FPS
medium268 FPS239 FPS
high223 FPS200 FPS
ultra190 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low238 FPS234 FPS
medium200 FPS191 FPS
high159 FPS156 FPS
ultra139 FPS138 FPS
4K
low159 FPS162 FPS
medium134 FPS135 FPS
high103 FPS104 FPS
ultra90 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
1080p
low689 FPS425 FPS
medium580 FPS353 FPS
high484 FPS308 FPS
ultra439 FPS271 FPS
1440p
low595 FPS368 FPS
medium525 FPS320 FPS
high441 FPS281 FPS
ultra378 FPS240 FPS
4K
low348 FPS265 FPS
medium314 FPS235 FPS
high295 FPS218 FPS
ultra261 FPS183 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
1080p
low648 FPS579 FPS
medium530 FPS579 FPS
high467 FPS579 FPS
ultra405 FPS579 FPS
1440p
low591 FPS579 FPS
medium491 FPS579 FPS
high427 FPS520 FPS
ultra371 FPS449 FPS
4K
low434 FPS501 FPS
medium374 FPS445 FPS
high339 FPS380 FPS
ultra290 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
1080p
low970 FPS579 FPS
medium883 FPS579 FPS
high766 FPS579 FPS
ultra689 FPS579 FPS
1440p
low829 FPS579 FPS
medium740 FPS579 FPS
high642 FPS579 FPS
ultra566 FPS545 FPS
4K
low567 FPS565 FPS
medium515 FPS506 FPS
high463 FPS450 FPS
ultra404 FPS386 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 65.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.

FeatureCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+167%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+8%
5 GHz
Base Clock
3.4 GHz
4.3 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
45,784+98%
23,167
Cinebench R23 Multi
31,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,846
Geekbench 6 Multi
18,980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
Socket
LGA1700
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

FeatureCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 240 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($409 vs $0), the Ryzen 5 240 is $409 cheaper.

FeatureCore i7-13700KRyzen 5 240
MSRP
$409
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
111.9
Release Date
2022
2025