
Core i7-12650HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-12650HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,215).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-12650HX
2022Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,215).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Core i7-12650HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12650HX and Ryzen 5 240

Core i7-12650HX
Core i7-12650HX
The Core i7-12650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,215 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-12650HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-12650HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12650HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-12650HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12650HX scores 23,215 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-12650HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-12650HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+115% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,215 | 23,167 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-12650HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12650HX) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i7-12650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12650HX targets Gaming Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-12650HX | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












