Core i7-12650HX vs Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i7-12650HX

14 Cores20 Thrd55 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-12650HX

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 240

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,215).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-12650HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Core i7-12650HX?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 240 is ahead with a 17.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12650HX pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core i7-12650HX also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-12650HX is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 240 still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 5 240 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 17.8% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 240 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
1080p
low177 FPS265 FPS
medium164 FPS239 FPS
high137 FPS200 FPS
ultra116 FPS172 FPS
1440p
low147 FPS234 FPS
medium127 FPS191 FPS
high103 FPS156 FPS
ultra87 FPS138 FPS
4K
low84 FPS162 FPS
medium77 FPS135 FPS
high62 FPS104 FPS
ultra48 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
1080p
low306 FPS425 FPS
medium261 FPS353 FPS
high221 FPS308 FPS
ultra201 FPS271 FPS
1440p
low257 FPS368 FPS
medium228 FPS320 FPS
high198 FPS281 FPS
ultra173 FPS240 FPS
4K
low157 FPS265 FPS
medium141 FPS235 FPS
high133 FPS218 FPS
ultra119 FPS183 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
1080p
low580 FPS579 FPS
medium580 FPS579 FPS
high545 FPS579 FPS
ultra462 FPS579 FPS
1440p
low580 FPS579 FPS
medium554 FPS579 FPS
high485 FPS520 FPS
ultra416 FPS449 FPS
4K
low498 FPS501 FPS
medium416 FPS445 FPS
high373 FPS380 FPS
ultra314 FPS315 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
1080p
low580 FPS579 FPS
medium580 FPS579 FPS
high580 FPS579 FPS
ultra580 FPS579 FPS
1440p
low580 FPS579 FPS
medium580 FPS579 FPS
high566 FPS579 FPS
ultra493 FPS545 FPS
4K
low522 FPS565 FPS
medium473 FPS506 FPS
high419 FPS450 FPS
ultra364 FPS386 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-12650HX and Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i7-12650HX

The Core i7-12650HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,215 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-12650HX packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-12650HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-12650HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 2 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-12650HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-12650HX scores 23,215 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-12650HX. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-12650HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.

FeatureCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+133%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.7 GHz
5 GHz+6%
Base Clock
2 GHz
4.3 GHz+115%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-HX (2022)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
23,215
23,167
Geekbench 6 Single
2,400
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-12650HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
Socket
FCBGA1964
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12650HX) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i7-12650HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-12650HX targets Gaming Laptop.

FeatureCore i7-12650HXRyzen 5 240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming Laptop