
Core i5-13600H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,291).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-13600H
2023Ryzen 5 240
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,167 vs 23,291).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600H better than Ryzen 5 240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 544 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 446 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 271 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 520 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 499 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 582 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 582 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 582 FPS | 565 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and Ryzen 5 240

Core i5-13600H
Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.


Ryzen 5 240
Ryzen 5 240
The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 23,167 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Ryzen 5 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












