
Core i7-5950HQ
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-5950HQ
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,667 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-5950HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
Core i7-5950HQ
2015Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 47W instead of 65W, a 18W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,667 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $169 MSRP, while Core i7-5950HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌38.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 47W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 1400 better than Core i7-5950HQ?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 5 1400

Core i7-5950HQ
Core i7-5950HQ
The Core i7-5950HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,667 points. Launch price was $623.


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-5950HQ and Ryzen 5 1400 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-5950HQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-5950HQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-5950HQ uses the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5950HQ scores 7,667 against the Ryzen 5 1400's 7,731 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 1400. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-5950HQ vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400.
| Feature | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+12% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-H (2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 7,667 | 7,731 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5950HQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-5950HQ | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











