
Core i7-5775C
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-5775C
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,688 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($366 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $197 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $366 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $366 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-5775C
2015Ryzen 5 1400
2017Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Costs $197 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $366 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 117.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $366 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,688 vs 7,731).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 45.7 PassMark/$ ($366 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 1400 better than Core i7-5775C?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 181 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-5775C and Ryzen 5 1400

Core i7-5775C
Core i7-5775C
The Core i7-5775C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,688 points. Launch price was $366.


Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
The Ryzen 5 1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 11 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,731 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-5775C and Ryzen 5 1400 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-5775C versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 1400 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-5775C (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-5775C uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5775C scores 7,688 against the Ryzen 5 1400's 7,731 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 1400. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-5775C vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 1400.
| Feature | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+3% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 7,688 | 7,731 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5775C uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 1400 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-5775C launched at $366 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 1400 debuted at $169. On MSRP ($366 vs $169), the Ryzen 5 1400 is $197 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-5775C delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 45.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 1400 — making the Ryzen 5 1400 the 74.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-5775C | Ryzen 5 1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $366 | $169-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 45.7+118% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











