
Opteron 6278
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Opteron 6278
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,733 vs 13,787).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6278, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Opteron 6278 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Opteron 6278
2012Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,733 vs 13,787).
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6278, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Opteron 6278 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G better than Opteron 6278?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 340 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 325 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Opteron 6278 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
The Opteron 6278 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,733 points. Launch price was $988.


Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,787 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Opteron 6278 packs 16 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6278 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Opteron 6278 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G — a 24% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Opteron 6278 uses the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Opteron 6278 scores 13,733 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G's 13,787 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6278 vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G.
| Feature | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 16+300% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 4.2 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Interlagos (2011−2012) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,733 | 13,787 |
Memory & Platform
The Opteron 6278 uses the G34 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Opteron 6278 | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G34 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












