
Core i9-9980HK
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9980HK
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 13,966).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i9-9980HK
2019Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,787 vs 13,966).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9980HK better than Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 300 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 325 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9980HK and Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

Core i9-9980HK
Core i9-9980HK
The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.


Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 13,787 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i9-9980HK has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-9980HK uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses Cezanne (2021−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9980HK scores 13,966 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G's 13,787 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i9-9980HK. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9980HK vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G.
| Feature | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+19% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) | Cezanne (2021−2025) |
| PassMark | 13,966+1% | 13,787 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9980HK | Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











