
Core i5-9600T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-9600T
2019Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,493 vs 9,601).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-9600T
2019Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+125% larger total L3 cache (9 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,493 vs 9,601).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 9 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-9600T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-9600T better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-9600T and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U

Core i5-9600T
Core i5-9600T
The Core i5-9600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,601 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 9,493 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-9600T packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-9600T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-9600T versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U — a 5.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-9600T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is built on the Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-9600T scores 9,601 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U's 9,493 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-9600T. L3 cache: 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-9600T vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+5% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 9 MB Intel® Smart Cache+125% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 9,601+1% | 9,493 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,344 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-9600T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-9600T) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U). The Core i5-9600T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-9600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-9600T rivals Ryzen 5 2400G.
| Feature | Core i5-9600T | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












