
Core i3-N305
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-N305
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,493 vs 9,600).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i3-N305 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Core i3-N305
2023Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,493 vs 9,600).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Core i3-N305 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-N305 better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-N305 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U

Core i3-N305
Core i3-N305
The Core i3-N305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 9,600 points. Launch price was $309.


Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 9,493 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i3-N305 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i3-N305 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-N305 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-N305 (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-N305 uses the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U uses Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-N305 scores 9,600 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U's 9,493 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-N305. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-N305 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+2300% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per module)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-N (2023) | Renoir PRO (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 9,600+1% | 9,493 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-N305 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-N305 | Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












