
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,940 vs 10,942).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
2020Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 6, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,940 vs 10,942).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 236 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 274 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE


Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,942 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 10,940 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). Both are built on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture using a 7 nm process. In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G scores 10,942 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE's 10,940 — a 0% lead for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+9% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,942 | 10,940 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,995 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,516 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,334 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE). The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 6), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Vega 6 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G launched at $149 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($149 vs $149), the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G delivers 73.4 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G the 0% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | $149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.4 | 73.4 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











