
Core i9-9880H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 8300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9880H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,531 vs 13,568).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9880H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i9-9880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-9880H
2019Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,531 vs 13,568).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9880H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i9-9880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300GE better than Core i9-9880H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 319 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9880H and Ryzen 3 8300GE

Core i9-9880H
Core i9-9880H
The Core i9-9880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,531 points. Launch price was $556.


Ryzen 3 8300GE
Ryzen 3 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9880H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i9-9880H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-9880H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-9880H uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9880H scores 13,531 against the Ryzen 3 8300GE's 13,568 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300GE. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9880H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE.
| Feature | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 13,531 | 13,568 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9880H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9880H | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












