Core i5-10600
Popular choices:
Ryzen 3 8300GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.6 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,573).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i5-10600
2020Ryzen 3 8300GE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $115 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.2 vs 55.6 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $244 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 55.6 vs 105.2 PassMark/$ ($244 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300GE moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10600 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,568 vs 13,573).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10600 better than Ryzen 3 8300GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 86 FPS |
Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 292 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 212 FPS | 124 FPS |
League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 295 FPS | 293 FPS |
Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10600 and Ryzen 3 8300GE
Core i5-10600
Core i5-10600
The Core i5-10600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,573 points. Launch price was $149.
Ryzen 3 8300GE
Ryzen 3 8300GE
The Ryzen 3 8300GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,568 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10600 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-10600 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300GE — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300GE (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-10600 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10600 scores 13,573 against the Ryzen 3 8300GE's 13,568 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-10600. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10600 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300GE.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 13,573 | 13,568 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10600 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300GE uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10600 launched at $244 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300GE debuted at $129. On MSRP ($244 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 8300GE is $115 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10600 delivers 55.6 pts/$ vs 105.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300GE — making the Ryzen 3 8300GE the 61.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10600 | Ryzen 3 8300GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $244 | $129-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.6 | 105.2+89% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-10600 and Ryzen 3 8300GE
