
Core i9-10880H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 8300G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10880H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10880H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,240).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $176 MSRP, while Core i9-10880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Core i9-10880H
2020Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10880H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,113 vs 14,240).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $176 MSRP, while Core i9-10880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10880H better than Ryzen 3 8300G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 348 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10880H and Ryzen 3 8300G

Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H
The Core i9-10880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,240 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10880H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i9-10880H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10880H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — a 4% clock advantage for the Core i9-10880H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-10880H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10880H scores 14,240 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-10880H. L3 cache: 16 MB on the Core i9-10880H vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.
| Feature | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB+100% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,240 | 14,113 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10880H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10880H | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











