
Core i7-8086K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 8300G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-8086K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,069 vs 14,113).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.1 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($425 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 33.1 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8086K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-8086K
2018Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.4% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($176 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 142.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 80.2 vs 33.1 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,069 vs 14,113).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.1 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($425 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 8300G moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8086K across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300G better than Core i7-8086K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-8086K and Ryzen 3 8300G

Core i7-8086K
Core i7-8086K
The Core i7-8086K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 June 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,069 points. Launch price was $425.


Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.
Processing Power
The Core i7-8086K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 8300G offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-8086K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-8086K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — a 2% clock advantage for the Core i7-8086K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-8086K uses the Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-8086K scores 14,069 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-8086K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.
| Feature | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-S (2017−2018) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,069 | 14,113 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-8086K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-8086K launched at $425 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300G debuted at $176. On MSRP ($425 vs $176), the Ryzen 3 8300G is $249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-8086K delivers 33.1 pts/$ vs 80.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300G — making the Ryzen 3 8300G the 83.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-8086K | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $425 | $176-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.1 | 80.2+142% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











