
Core i3-13100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 8300G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-13100
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $42 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.0 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300G across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,064 vs 14,113).
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 80.2 vs 105.0 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
Core i3-13100
2023Ryzen 3 8300G
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $42 less on MSRP ($134 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 105.0 vs 80.2 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $176 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 65W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 8300G across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,064 vs 14,113).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 80.2 vs 105.0 PassMark/$ ($176 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 8300G better than Core i3-13100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 196 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 342 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 292 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 353 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-13100 and Ryzen 3 8300G

Core i3-13100
Core i3-13100
The Core i3-13100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,064 points. Launch price was $134.


Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G
The Ryzen 3 8300G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix2 (2024) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 14,113 points. Launch price was $176.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-13100 and Ryzen 3 8300G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i3-13100 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 8300G — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 8300G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-13100 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses Phoenix2 (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-13100 scores 14,064 against the Ryzen 3 8300G's 14,113 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 8300G. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-13100 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 8300G.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Phoenix2 (2024) |
| PassMark | 14,064 | 14,113 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-13100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 8300G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-13100 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 8300G debuted at $176. On MSRP ($134 vs $176), the Core i3-13100 is $42 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-13100 delivers 105.0 pts/$ vs 80.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 8300G — making the Core i3-13100 the 26.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-13100 | Ryzen 3 8300G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $134-24% | $176 |
| Performance per Dollar | 105.0+31% | 80.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











