
Core i7-9700T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 7330U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700T
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 7330U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,618 vs 10,645).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700T
2019Ryzen 3 7330U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 7330U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,618 vs 10,645).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $323 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7330U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7330U better than Core i7-9700T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 191 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 266 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700T and Ryzen 3 7330U

Core i7-9700T
Core i7-9700T
The Core i7-9700T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 10,618 points. Launch price was $323.


Ryzen 3 7330U
Ryzen 3 7330U
The Ryzen 3 7330U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,645 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700T packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 7330U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i7-9700T versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7330U — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700T uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7330U uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700T scores 10,618 against the Ryzen 3 7330U's 10,645 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 7330U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700T vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7330U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,618 | 10,645 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700T uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7330U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700T) / not specified (Ryzen 3 7330U). The Core i7-9700T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 7330U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700T | Ryzen 3 7330U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











