
Ryzen 3 7320U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,527 vs 8,627).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,527 vs 8,627).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 7320U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 211 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 213 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7320U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G


Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U
The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 3 7320U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7320U uses the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7320U scores 8,627 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 7320U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+5% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 6 nm-57% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 8,627+1% | 8,527 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 4,907 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,213 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 3,589 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 3 7320U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT6 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-5500 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). The Ryzen 3 7320U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.
| Feature | Ryzen 3 7320U | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 610M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












