Ryzen 3 7320U vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

AMD

Ryzen 3 7320U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,527 vs 8,627).
  • Launch MSRP is still $193 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 7320U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7320U better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is ahead with a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 7320U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 7320U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. At roughly 8,527 PassMark with 4 cores and 8 threads, it only makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 7320U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
1080p
low168 FPS201 FPS
medium134 FPS170 FPS
high108 FPS135 FPS
ultra84 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low141 FPS172 FPS
medium111 FPS143 FPS
high88 FPS112 FPS
ultra68 FPS81 FPS
4K
low65 FPS68 FPS
medium55 FPS60 FPS
high43 FPS47 FPS
ultra34 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
1080p
low216 FPS206 FPS
medium216 FPS178 FPS
high200 FPS165 FPS
ultra172 FPS130 FPS
1440p
low216 FPS175 FPS
medium195 FPS151 FPS
high177 FPS140 FPS
ultra151 FPS115 FPS
4K
low171 FPS131 FPS
medium151 FPS116 FPS
high124 FPS95 FPS
ultra105 FPS70 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
1080p
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS213 FPS
1440p
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS213 FPS
4K
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS211 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
1080p
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS213 FPS
1440p
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS213 FPS
4K
low216 FPS213 FPS
medium216 FPS213 FPS
high216 FPS213 FPS
ultra216 FPS213 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 3 7320U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

AMD

Ryzen 3 7320U

The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G

The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 3 7320U and Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G — a 5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 7320U uses the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 3 7320U scores 8,627 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 7320U. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.1 GHz+5%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
6 nm-57%
14 nm
Architecture
Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
Raven Ridge (2017−2019)
PassMark
8,627+1%
8,527
Cinebench R23 Multi
4,907
Geekbench 6 Single
1,213
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,589
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 3 7320U uses the FT6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Socket
FT6
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-5500
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). The Ryzen 3 7320U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.

FeatureRyzen 3 7320URyzen 5 PRO 2400G
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 610M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget