Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 3 7320U

CPU

GPU

Core i7-7700

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 7320U

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-7700

4 / 8

8,642

+0.2%

8,627

0.0%

FX-6350

Ryzen 3 3350U

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-7700

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 4,907).
❌Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

✅+242% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.

Core i7-7700

2017

Ryzen 3 7320U

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.

Why buy it

✅+242% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,435 vs 4,907).
❌Launch MSRP is still $272 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7700 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-7700.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 7320U better than Core i7-7700?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-7700 is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U pulls ahead with 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-7700 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 7320U is the better fit. You are getting 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 7320U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 3 7320U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $272 MSRP, and it gives you 242% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-7700 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 7320U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FT6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-7700 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 7320U Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	216 FPS	168 FPS
medium	171 FPS	134 FPS
high	136 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	176 FPS	141 FPS
medium	136 FPS	111 FPS
high	107 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	65 FPS
medium	61 FPS	55 FPS
high	48 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i7-7700 Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	195 FPS
high	204 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	216 FPS	171 FPS
medium	185 FPS	151 FPS
high	155 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	105 FPS

Open Core i7-7700 Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i7-7700 Open Ryzen 3 7320U

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
1080p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS
1440p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS
4K
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	216 FPS	216 FPS
high	216 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	216 FPS	216 FPS

Open Core i7-7700 Open Ryzen 3 7320U

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7700 and Ryzen 3 7320U

Core i7-7700

The Core i7-7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,642 points. Launch price was $303.

Ryzen 3 7320U

The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7700 and Ryzen 3 7320U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i7-7700 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 2.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-7700 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-7700 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7700 scores 8,642 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-7700. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,435 vs 4,907 (109.5% advantage for the Ryzen 3 7320U). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.

Feature	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.2 GHz+2%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022)
PassMark	8,642	8,627
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,435	4,907+242%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,213
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,589

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7700 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Core i7-7700 versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320U — the Ryzen 3 7320U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-7700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-7700) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320U) — the Core i7-7700 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series,200-series (Core i7-7700) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).

Feature	Core i7-7700	Ryzen 3 7320U
Socket	LGA1151	FT6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	LPDDR5-5500+25%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-7700) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 630 (Core i7-7700) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 3 7320U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7700 targets Gaming, Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-7700 rivals Ryzen 5 1600; Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.