
Core i7-1160G7
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 7320U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-1160G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7320U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1598 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1598 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,627 vs 8,720).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-1160G7
2020Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1598 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 7320U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1598 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,627 vs 8,720).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-1160G7 better than Ryzen 3 7320U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 105 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 216 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-1160G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U

Core i7-1160G7
Core i7-1160G7
The Core i7-1160G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1598. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,720 points. Launch price was $426.


Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U
The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-1160G7 and Ryzen 3 7320U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i7-1160G7 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-1160G7 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-1160G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1160G7 scores 8,720 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-1160G7. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,758 vs 1,213, a 36.7% lead for the Core i7-1160G7 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-1160G7 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-UP4 (2020−2021) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| PassMark | 8,720+1% | 8,627 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,907 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,758+45% | 1,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,589 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-1160G7 uses the FCBGA1598 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4x-4267 on the Core i7-1160G7 versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320U — the Ryzen 3 7320U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-1160G7 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-UP3 (Core i7-1160G7) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1598 | FT6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4x-4267 | LPDDR5-5500+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Core i7-1160G7 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-1160G7) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i7-1160G7) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 3 7320U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-1160G7 targets Premium Ultrabook/Tablet, Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-1160G7 rivals Ryzen 7 4800U; Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.
| Feature | Core i7-1160G7 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Premium Ultrabook/Tablet | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












