
Core i3-10100
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 7320U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-10100
2020Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,213 vs 1,430).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,907 vs 5,612).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10100.
Core i3-10100
2020Ryzen 3 7320U
2022Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Ryzen 3 7320U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FT6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $122 MSRP, while Ryzen 3 7320U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 3 7320U moves to FT6 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,213 vs 1,430).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (4,907 vs 5,612).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i3-10100.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-10100 better than Ryzen 3 7320U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 105 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 216 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 3 7320U

Core i3-10100
Core i3-10100
The Core i3-10100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,526 points. Launch price was $130.


Ryzen 3 7320U
Ryzen 3 7320U
The Ryzen 3 7320U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FT6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 8,627 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-10100 and Ryzen 3 7320U share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-10100 versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 3 7320U — a 4.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-10100 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i3-10100 uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-10100 scores 8,526 against the Ryzen 3 7320U's 8,627 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 7320U. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 5,612 vs 4,907 (13.4% advantage for the Core i3-10100). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,430 vs 1,213, a 16.4% lead for the Core i3-10100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 4,300 vs 3,589 (18% advantage for the Core i3-10100). L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-10100 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+5% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-S (2020) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) (2022) |
| PassMark | 8,526 | 8,627+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,612+14% | 4,907 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,430+18% | 1,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,300+20% | 3,589 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-10100 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 7320U uses FT6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i3-10100 versus LPDDR5-5500 on the Ryzen 3 7320U — the Ryzen 3 7320U supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-10100 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-10100) vs 4 (Ryzen 3 7320U) — the Core i3-10100 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 400-series,500-series (Core i3-10100) and FT6 (Ryzen 3 7320U).
| Feature | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FT6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5-5500+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-10100) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 7320U). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-10100) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 3 7320U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-10100 targets Gaming, Ryzen 3 7320U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-10100 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X; Ryzen 3 7320U rivals Core i3-1215U.
| Feature | Core i3-10100 | Ryzen 3 7320U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












