
Core i5-10500H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10500H
2020Why buy it
- ✅+49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 4100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,970 vs 11,062).
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i5-10500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-10500H
2020Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅+49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 4100 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,970 vs 11,062).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core i5-10500H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-10500H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 4100 better than Core i5-10500H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 247 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10500H and Ryzen 3 4100

Core i5-10500H
Core i5-10500H
The Core i5-10500H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 153 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,970 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100
The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10500H packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 4100 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10500H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-10500H versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-10500H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-10500H uses the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-10500H scores 10,970 against the Ryzen 3 4100's 11,062 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Core i5-10500H vs 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100.
| Feature | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB+50% | 8.00391 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 153 kB | 512K (per core)+235% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 10,970 | 11,062 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,435 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10500H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1440 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10500H) / not specified (Ryzen 3 4100). The Core i5-10500H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10500H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-10500H rivals Ryzen 5 5600H.
| Feature | Core i5-10500H | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












