Core 7 160UL vs Ryzen 3 4100

Intel

Core 7 160UL

10 Cores12 Thrd15 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2024

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 4100

4 Cores8 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 7 160UL

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 11,062).

Ryzen 3 4100

2022

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 7 160UL better than Ryzen 3 4100?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core 7 160UL is ahead with a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 4100 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Core 7 160UL also has the bigger cache pool with 49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 4100 is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 7 160UL is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 3 4100 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core 7 160UL is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen 3 4100 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. Ryzen 3 4100 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 3 4100 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 7 160UL is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and 49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
1080p
low262 FPS182 FPS
medium234 FPS145 FPS
high200 FPS118 FPS
ultra171 FPS89 FPS
1440p
low224 FPS155 FPS
medium180 FPS122 FPS
high149 FPS97 FPS
ultra131 FPS74 FPS
4K
low157 FPS69 FPS
medium127 FPS58 FPS
high98 FPS46 FPS
ultra85 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
1080p
low228 FPS277 FPS
medium193 FPS235 FPS
high175 FPS204 FPS
ultra154 FPS157 FPS
1440p
low204 FPS235 FPS
medium179 FPS203 FPS
high162 FPS177 FPS
ultra137 FPS142 FPS
4K
low152 FPS181 FPS
medium140 FPS164 FPS
high133 FPS132 FPS
ultra114 FPS100 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
1080p
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS277 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS277 FPS
4K
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS247 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
1080p
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS277 FPS
1440p
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS277 FPS
4K
low276 FPS277 FPS
medium276 FPS277 FPS
high276 FPS277 FPS
ultra276 FPS277 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Ryzen 3 4100

Intel

Core 7 160UL

The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Ryzen 3 4100

The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 4100 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 3 4100's 11,062 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100.

FeatureCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
Cores / Threads
10 / 12+150%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+30%
4 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+111%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8.00391 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
7 nm-30%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS (2024)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
11,043
11,062
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 7 160ULRyzen 3 4100
Socket
LGA1700
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0