
Core 7 160UL
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 7 160UL
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 11,062).
Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core 7 160UL
2024Ryzen 3 4100
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+49.9% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,043 vs 11,062).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 7 160UL across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $99 MSRP, while Core 7 160UL mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 7 160UL moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 7 160UL better than Ryzen 3 4100?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 100 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 247 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 277 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 7 160UL and Ryzen 3 4100

Core 7 160UL
Core 7 160UL
The Core 7 160UL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,043 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 4100
Ryzen 3 4100
The Ryzen 3 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8.00391 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 11,062 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 7 160UL packs 10 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 4100 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core 7 160UL has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core 7 160UL versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 4100 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 7 160UL (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core 7 160UL uses the Raptor Lake-PS (2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 7 160UL scores 11,043 against the Ryzen 3 4100's 11,062 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 4100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 7 160UL vs 8.00391 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 4100.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 12+150% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+30% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.8 GHz+111% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8.00391 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 11,043 | 11,062 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 7 160UL uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 3 4100 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 7 160UL | Ryzen 3 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













