
Core i5-10505
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 3100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-10505
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 120.5 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $93 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.5 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10505 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,009).
Core i5-10505
2021Ryzen 3 3100
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $93 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.5 vs 62.5 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.5 vs 120.5 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10505 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,928 vs 12,009).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10505 better than Ryzen 3 3100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 89 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 179 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 298 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-10505 and Ryzen 3 3100

Core i5-10505
Core i5-10505
The Core i5-10505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2021 (4 years ago). It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 12,009 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
The Ryzen 3 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 24 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 11,928 points. Launch price was $99.
Processing Power
The Core i5-10505 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 3100 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i5-10505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-10505 versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3100 — a 16.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10505 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 3 3100 is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i5-10505 scores 12,009 against the Ryzen 3 3100's 11,928 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-10505. L3 cache: 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i5-10505 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3100.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+18% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | — | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 12,009 | 11,928 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-10505 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 3 3100 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i5-10505) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3100). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3100 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-10505 launched at $192 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 3100 debuted at $99. On MSRP ($192 vs $99), the Ryzen 3 3100 is $93 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-10505 delivers 62.5 pts/$ vs 120.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 3100 — making the Ryzen 3 3100 the 63.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-10505 | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192 | $99-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 62.5 | 120.5+93% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












