
Core i5-1034G1
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-1034G1
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Ryzen 3 2300X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,550 vs 7,564).
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i5-1034G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1034G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-1034G1
2019Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics G1, while Ryzen 3 2300X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 3 2300X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,550 vs 7,564).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $129 MSRP, while Core i5-1034G1 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1034G1 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 2300X better than Core i5-1034G1?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 156 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-1034G1 and Ryzen 3 2300X

Core i5-1034G1
Core i5-1034G1
The Core i5-1034G1 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 6 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 7,550 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-1034G1 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 2300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-1034G1 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 2300X (base: 0.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-1034G1 uses the Ice Lake U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1034G1 scores 7,550 against the Ryzen 3 2300X's 7,564 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 2300X. L3 cache: 6 MB on the Core i5-1034G1 vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X.
| Feature | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 0.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz+338% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake U (2019−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,550 | 7,564 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,475 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1034G1) / not specified (Ryzen 3 2300X). The Core i5-1034G1 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics G1), while the Ryzen 3 2300X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1034G1 targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-1034G1 rivals Ryzen 5 3500U.
| Feature | Core i5-1034G1 | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics G1 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Mainstream Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











