
Core i3-9350K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 2300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i3-9350K
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 41.3 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 91W vs 65W.
Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 41.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 91W, a 26W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9350K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,596).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Core i3-9350K
2019Ryzen 3 2300X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 41.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $184 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 91W, a 26W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 41.3 vs 58.6 PassMark/$ ($184 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 91W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-9350K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,564 vs 7,596).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-9350K better than Ryzen 3 2300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 156 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 189 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-9350K and Ryzen 3 2300X

Core i3-9350K
Core i3-9350K
The Core i3-9350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,596 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen 3 2300X
Ryzen 3 2300X
The Ryzen 3 2300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,564 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-9350K and Ryzen 3 2300X share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i3-9350K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 3 2300X — a 9.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-9350K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i3-9350K uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 2300X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-9350K scores 7,596 against the Ryzen 3 2300X's 7,564 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-9350K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-9350K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 2300X.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+10% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+14% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,596 | 7,564 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-9350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 2300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-9350K launched at $184 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 2300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($184 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 2300X is $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-9350K delivers 41.3 pts/$ vs 58.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 2300X — making the Ryzen 3 2300X the 34.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-9350K | Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $184 | $129-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 41.3 | 58.6+42% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











