
Core i7-980
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-980
2011Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,890 vs 6,923).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $454 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 354.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-980.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-980
2011Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $454 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 354.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 11.8 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-980.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,890 vs 6,923).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Core i7-980?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-980 and Ryzen 3 1300X

Core i7-980
Core i7-980
The Core i7-980 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.33 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,890 points. Launch price was $1,109.


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Processing Power
The Core i7-980 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 3 1300X offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-980 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-980 versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 1300X (base: 3.33 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-980 uses the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-980 scores 6,890 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-980 vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 1300X.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.33 GHz | 3.4 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,890 | 6,923 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,486 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-980 uses the LGA1366 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1366 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-980) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-980 launched at $583 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($583 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $454 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-980 delivers 11.8 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 127.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-980 | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $583 | $129-78% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8 | 53.7+355% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













