
Core i7-4790S
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 1300X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4790S
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($312 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $183 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 140.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4790S.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,973).
Core i7-4790S
2014Ryzen 3 1300X
2017Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $183 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 140.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 22.3 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $312 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-4790S.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($312 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,923 vs 6,973).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-4790S better than Ryzen 3 1300X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4790S and Ryzen 3 1300X

Core i7-4790S
Core i7-4790S
The Core i7-4790S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,973 points. Launch price was $303.


Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X
The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4790S packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1300X's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i7-4790S versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-4790S (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-4790S uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4790S scores 6,973 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-4790S. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 6,973 | 6,923 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,486 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,120 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,155 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4790S uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4790S) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4790S launched at $312 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($312 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $183 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4790S delivers 22.3 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 82.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4790S | Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $312 | $129-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 53.7+141% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













