Core i3-8350K vs Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel

Core i3-8350K

4 Cores4 Thrd91 WWMax: 4 GHz2017

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i3-8350K

2017

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (6,911 vs 6,923).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 53.7 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 40% higher power demand at 91W vs 65W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1300X.

Ryzen 3 1300X

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.2% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $121 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 94.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.7 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($129 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 91W, a 26W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-8350K across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 1300X better than Core i3-8350K?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i3-8350K is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1300X pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 1300X is the better fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 3 1300X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 3 1300X is $121 cheaper on MSRP at $129 MSRP versus $250 MSRP, and it gives you 0.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i3-8350K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 94.1% better value on MSRP (53.7 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 1300X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium162 FPS156 FPS
high128 FPS127 FPS
ultra90 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS151 FPS
medium137 FPS124 FPS
high106 FPS98 FPS
ultra75 FPS75 FPS
4K
low74 FPS67 FPS
medium63 FPS59 FPS
high48 FPS46 FPS
ultra38 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS169 FPS
high173 FPS157 FPS
ultra149 FPS124 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS169 FPS
medium173 FPS145 FPS
high161 FPS133 FPS
ultra132 FPS110 FPS
4K
low173 FPS132 FPS
medium149 FPS117 FPS
high121 FPS96 FPS
ultra92 FPS72 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
4K
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS160 FPS
ultra154 FPS128 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
1080p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS
4K
low173 FPS173 FPS
medium173 FPS173 FPS
high173 FPS173 FPS
ultra173 FPS173 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-8350K and Ryzen 3 1300X

Intel

Core i3-8350K

The Core i3-8350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 91 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,911 points. Launch price was $168.

AMD

Ryzen 3 1300X

The Ryzen 3 1300X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,923 points. Launch price was $129.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-8350K and Ryzen 3 1300X share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Core i3-8350K versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1300X — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-8350K (base: 4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-8350K uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-8350K scores 6,911 against the Ryzen 3 1300X's 6,923 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 3 1300X. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+8%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+18%
3.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
6,911
6,923
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,486
Geekbench 6 Single
1,120
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,155
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-8350K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1300X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-8350K) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1300X). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1300X targets Gaming.

FeatureCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i3-8350K launched at $250 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 1300X debuted at $129. On MSRP ($250 vs $129), the Ryzen 3 1300X is $121 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-8350K delivers 27.6 pts/$ vs 53.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 1300X — making the Ryzen 3 1300X the 64% better value option.

FeatureCore i3-8350KRyzen 3 1300X
MSRP
$250
$129-48%
Performance per Dollar
27.6
53.7+95%
Release Date
2017
2017