
Core i7-4930MX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 3 1200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-4930MX
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 65W, a 8W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,387 vs 6,407).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.
Ryzen 3 1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core i7-4930MX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4930MX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Core i7-4930MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i7-4930MX
2013Ryzen 3 1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 57W instead of 65W, a 8W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Stealth), unlike Core i7-4930MX.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,387 vs 6,407).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 3 1200.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4930MX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $109 MSRP, while Core i7-4930MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 3 1200 better than Core i7-4930MX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 109 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4930MX and Ryzen 3 1200

Core i7-4930MX
Core i7-4930MX
The Core i7-4930MX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 57 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,387 points. Launch price was $1,096.


Ryzen 3 1200
Ryzen 3 1200
The Ryzen 3 1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,407 points. Launch price was $109.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4930MX packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 1200's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930MX versus 3.4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 1200 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4930MX (base: 3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-4930MX uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4930MX scores 6,387 against the Ryzen 3 1200's 6,407 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 3 1200. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+15% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.1 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Summit Ridge (Zen) (2017) |
| PassMark | 6,387 | 6,407 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,013 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4930MX uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 1200 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4930MX) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 1200). Primary use case: Ryzen 3 1200 targets Budget.
| Feature | Core i7-4930MX | Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













