G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 165W, a 75W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 240mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅230.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 83% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌83.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 90W.
❌18.8% longer card at 240mm vs 202mm.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 165W, a 75W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 240mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅230.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 83% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 33.7 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌83.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 90W.
❌18.8% longer card at 240mm vs 202mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than GeForce GTX 950?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7600 averages 230.0% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 16,581 vs 5,357 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600 is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 950 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 209.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 7600 is about 69.2% more expensive on MSRP at $269 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 230.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 209.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 950 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 950 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 950 is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 5,357 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	79 FPS	168 FPS
medium	64 FPS	149 FPS
high	52 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	140 FPS
medium	54 FPS	114 FPS
high	39 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	85 FPS
medium	22 FPS	72 FPS
high	14 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open Radeon RX 7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	107 FPS	414 FPS
medium	79 FPS	349 FPS
high	61 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	54 FPS	241 FPS
medium	39 FPS	205 FPS
high	26 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	109 FPS
medium	14 FPS	91 FPS
high	11 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open Radeon RX 7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	241 FPS	746 FPS
medium	193 FPS	597 FPS
high	161 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	560 FPS
medium	145 FPS	448 FPS
high	121 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	280 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	373 FPS
medium	96 FPS	298 FPS
high	77 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	187 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open Radeon RX 7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	140 FPS	604 FPS
medium	113 FPS	517 FPS
high	97 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	102 FPS	468 FPS
medium	84 FPS	397 FPS
high	73 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	293 FPS
medium	46 FPS	271 FPS
high	35 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	187 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open Radeon RX 7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 209.5%. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 2655 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score	5,357	16,581+210%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS+1092%
Boost Clock	1188 MHz	2655 MHz+123%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	288 KB	512 KB+78%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 950 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 950 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 106 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 171.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	106 GB/s	288 GB/s+172%
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
DirectX	12_1	12.2+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd Gen (GeForce GTX 950) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 950) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
Encoder	NVENC 2nd Gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd Gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	Radeon RX 7600
TDP	90W-45%	165W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	202mm	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	59.5	100.5+69%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 40.9% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 82.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).