
GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 165W, a 43W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,799 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+336.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌35.2% higher power demand at 165W vs 122W.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 122W instead of 165W, a 43W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+336.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,799 vs 16,581).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌35.2% higher power demand at 165W vs 122W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than GeForce GTX 680MX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 680MX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 597 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 187 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 187 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 336.5%. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799 | 16,581+336% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 680MX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 680MX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 80% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 288 GB/s+80% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 30% difference. The GeForce GTX 680MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W-26% | 165W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 100.5+223% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $269 |
| Codename | — | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 23 2012 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #520 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












